Oh Trump

So in “the olden days” a public sphere was of a very simplified explanation, people talking (often turning to debate) about anything relevant at the time, positive or negative, even controversial. Back then there wasn’t ease in input, mostly due to stereotypical boundaries e.g. social class, but also because of the way in which they interacted (predominately verbally), but oh how times have changed! With the introduction of the new and improved mediated public sphere, thanks to the  internet, anyone is free to say anything no matter where on earth they come from. A really relevant and rather recent instance, would be the fact that Donald Trump was running for president (spoiler alert: he won).

Boy were those hard times, not only because of the fact that DONALD TRUMP was RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT?!,  but the amount of “input” which was exerted everywhere online, when I say everywhere I mean EVERYWHERE. You couldn’t miss it, and aside from the endless memes (examples below), parodies and comedic interpretations, there was serious talk, interaction and debate on the issue and outcome.

17761529_10206804576792676_125016187_o

During the election, everything Trump ate, wore, said and most importantly TWEETED was highly scrutinised and for good reason too. Lets just say the public sphere was going absolutely crazy for Donald Trump and for the majority, not in a good way. Many debates like the one below were broadcast on what you would call a mediated public sphere provided by a public service broadcaster. Q&A are a very organised example of freedom of expression, who usually provide a fair balance of opinions, but from the captions at the bottom of the screen which reveal the audiences majority answers to a question (based on the topic), it was not balanced in this case.

The Q&A known for its professional more tamed version of freedom of expression was nothing compared to social medias such as Twitter, where there was no holding back on opinion. Twitter is a much more widespread instance in which people can literally say whatever is on their mind, no matter where they are in the world, compared to the very localised, Q&A. In my opinion Twitter is the best depiction of the mediated public sphere in relation to the Donald Trump’s election saga, and the best part is, it still hasn’t stopped, take a look below:

 

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Oh Trump

  1. Tanmayi kotamraju

    Hey, I read your post. Absolutely loved it! Fantastic examples, well written and easy to read. I like how you’ve incorporated an array of relevant examples and videos so it is convenient for readers to access them. But if i wasn’t a student from BCM110 i wouldn’t completely follow through the post. So i would suggest you to address an audience out of our subject too! Nonetheless, Loved the personalised and comedic aspects to it! Keep up the good work! -Tanmayi Kotamraju

    Like

  2. Riah Swain

    Hey, great blog post! Your writing style had me engaged from the very first paragraph and your use of memes and videos kept the post engaging through to the end. You showed a good understanding of the public sphere and I liked how you linked it to Trump, a very controversial topic that has taken over the mediated public sphere recently. Q&A and Twitter are great examples of the public sphere used today, both in popular culture and high culture. One suggestion I would make is that the post would benefit from referencing articles and journals to make it more credible. Nonetheless, I enjoyed reading this! Good work.

    Like

  3. Alexander Mastronardi

    This was a great post, I really liked the structure as there was a clear introduction to the concept of the public sphere which led directly into a contemporary example of the topic. The vast collection of memes criticising Trump was useful in showing how much contribution there was to the online public sphere in relation to Trumps election win. I also felt the comparison between Q&A and twitter as a form of debate for the issue as it expanded on the idea that television is extremely mediated and the freedom of expression that is involved is much more lighter compared to twitter as you discussed in your post.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s